Prediction of Rudy Quan [666th] vs Jonas Pelle Hartenstein [] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W L W W W L L L W L
Form
W L W W W L W W W LHead To Head: Quan 0 - 0 Hartenstein
They have played 0 sets in total, with Quan winning 0 and Hartenstein winning 0. The last match between Quan and Hartenstein was at the M15 Orange Park, 02-05-2024, Second, Clay with Rudy Quan getting the victory w/o.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Rudy Quan | 0 |
Jonas Pelle Hartenstein | 0 |
Quan | Stats | Hartenstein |
---|---|---|
33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 62% (8-5) |
0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
666 | Ranking | N/A |
666 | Highest Rank | |
19 | Age | 23 |
- | Plays | - |
0 | Titles | 0 |
59% (32-22) | Career Total W/L | 62% (47-29) |
$14,730 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Quan VS Hartenstein H2H Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
w/o |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rudy Quan vs Jonas Pelle Hartenstein Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Quan 0 - 0 Hartenstein
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Quan has won 41.41% of points on their second serve, while Hartenstein has won 45.29%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Quan, in recent form, has won 48.86% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hartenstein has won 49.51%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.8% and 27.75% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Quan has saved 55.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hartenstein has saved 53.85% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Quan has won 60.87% of matches played (W/L 14/ 9), with Hartenstein winning 63.16% (W/L 24/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Quan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2). Hartenstein has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 16/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 25/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Quan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 7/ 5), where as Hartenstein has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.16% of matches (W/L 24/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Quan has played against opponents with an average rank of 222 while Hartenstein has played against players with an average rank of 66.08.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Quan has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hartenstein has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Quan has converted 53.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hartenstein has converted 40.91% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Rudy Quan vs Jonas Pelle Hartenstein Best Odds For The Match
Rudy Quan Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Rudy Quan
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Rudy Quan
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Stefan Dostanic
Player
Rudy Quan
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
11
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Borna Gojo
Player
Rudy Quan
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
55
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ethan Quinn
Player
Rudy Quan
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
77%
(
66 of
86)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Rudy Quan
Player
Guy Den Ouden
78%
(
72 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Rudy Quan
Player
Keegan Smith
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Rudy Quan
Player
Patrick Zahraj
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Jonas Pelle Hartenstein Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alexis Canter
Player
Jonas Pelle Hartenstein
55%
(
65 of
119)
1st Serve %
59%
(
77 of
131)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
49 of
77)
48%
(
26 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
47 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
57 of
131)
129
Total Points Won
121
|
6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Marcus Walters
Player
Jonas Pelle Hartenstein
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve %
72%
(
23 of
32)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
56%
(
10 of
18)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
43%
(
10 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
25
Total Points Won
30
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Jonas Pelle Hartenstein
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jonas Pelle Hartenstein
Player
Francois Musitelli
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
7
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
61
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 3-6 10-5 | H2H |
view more
Where To Watch Quan vs Hartenstein?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Quan Vs Hartenstein is now available here.

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59% (32/22) | Win/Loss | 62% (47/29) |
56% (70/56) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (100/68) |
52% (628/589) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (890/757) |
0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
21 | Aces Total | 54 |
0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
117 | Total Double Faults | 107 |
1:9:21 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
122.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 64.16 |
70% (1663/2384) | 1st Serve % | 63% (1291/2037) |
58% (967/1663) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (817/1291) |
44% (315/721) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (363/746) |
49% (148/299) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (79/195) |
46% (1078/2322) | Return Points Win % | 40% (825/2073) |
59% (32/54) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (46/74) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
70% (7/10) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (10/15) |
67% (12/18) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (11/18) |
93% (28/26) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 95% (42/40) |
7% (28/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (42/2) |
23% (26/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (34/7) |
See recent tennis photos of Quan and Hartenstein
Other Predictions
- Loading news...